Contents of N4/2020

all contents

Contents of N4'2020

GOVERNANCE

Resource efficiency of the economy: strategic planning aspects
Skobelev D.O., PhD (Economics), Director of the Research Institute “Environmental Industrial Policy Centre”

Annotation:
Resource efficiency enhancement and recycle of secondary resources are considered as the key directions of the environmental industrial policy of Russia. The necessity to analyse risks and opportunities determined by the transition to Best Available Techniques, while developing strategic development plans of industrial enterprises. Case studies of greener Russian industries are presented. The viability of setting an agency co-ordinating development and implementation of strategic plans and programmes in the field of resource efficiency enhancement.
Keywords: strategic planning, resource efficiency, Best Available Techniques, environmental industrial policy, recycle of secondary resources.

Referenses
1. Federalnyi zakon ot 28.06.2014 № 172-FZ «O strategicheskom planirovanii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii» [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_164841/ (data obrashcheniia: 20.05.2020).
2. Khachaturov A.E., Belkovskii A.N. Sovremennyi integratsionnyi menedzhment. – M.: DiS, 2006.
3.  Vavilov S.Iu., Khachaturov A.E. Strategicheskoe planirovanie kak programma dolgosrochnogo razvitiia i adaptatsii kliuchevykh kompetentsii kompanii // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 4–18.
4.  Khachaturov A.E., Kulikov Iu.A. Osnovy menedzhmenta kachestva. – M.: Delo i Servis, 2003.
5. Daiman S.Iu., Guseva T.V., Zaika E.V., Sokornova T.V. Sistemy ekologicheskogo menedzhmenta: prakticheskii kurs. – M.: Forum, 2010.
6. Skobelev D.O., Stepanova M.V. Energeticheskii menedzhment: prochtenie 2020. – M.: FGAU «NII «TsEPP», 2020.
7. Rasporiazhenie Pravitelstva RF ot 19.03.2014 № 398-r «O komplekse mer, napravlennykh na otkaz ot ispolzovaniia ustarevshikh i neeffektivnykh tekhnologii, perekhod na printsipy nailuchshikh dostupnykh tekhnologii i vnedrenie sovremennykh tekhnologii» [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: static.government.ru/media/files/41d4cc19757c1099b2b3.pdf (data obrashcheniia: 20.05.2020).
8. Skobelev D.O. Formirovanie infrastruktury resursno-tekhnologicheskoi transformatsii promyshlennosti // Ekonomika ustoichivogo razvitiia. – 2020. – № 1 (41). – S. 162–167.
9.  Kelli V.Zh. Ideologiia // Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar. – M.: Nauka, 1983. – S. 199–201.
10. Bobylev S.N., Skobelev D.O. Prirodnyi kapital i tekhnologicheskie transformatsii // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom. – 2020. – № 1. – S. 89–100.
11. Frosch R.A., Gallopoulos N.E. Strategies for Manufacturing. In: Scientific American. – 1989. – No. 189 (3). – Pp. 144–152.
12.  Iagodin G.A., Zaitsev V.A.  Khimicheskaia tekhnologiia, promyshlennaia ekologiia i okhrana okruzhaiushchei sredy. – M.: Znanie, 1982.
13. Zaitsev V.A., Makarov S.V. Vvedenie v promyshlennuiu ekologiiu. – M.: MKhTI im. D.I. Mendeleeva, 1983.
14.  Zaitsev V.A., Makarov S.V., Kuznetsov V.A. Promyshlennaia ekologiia. – M.: Khimiia, 1988.
15. Odum Iu. Ekologiia: V 2-kh t. – M.: Mir, 1986.
16. Postanovlenie Soveta Ministrov SSSR ot 08.04.1975 № 271 «O merakh po ukrepleniiu materialno-tekhnicheskoi bazy organizatsii i predpriiatii po zagotovke, obrabotke i pererabotke vtorichnogo syria sistemy Gossnaba SSSR i Tsentrosoiuza», FK «Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii», Delo № 609, listy 174, 175.
17. Dudenkov S.V. Ekonomika, organizatsiia i planirovanie zagotovki i pererabotki vtorichnogo syria. – M.: Ekonomika, 1990.
18.  Stigliani W.M., Anderberg S. Industrial metabolism at the regional level: the Rhine Basin. In: Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustainable Development. Ed. by R.U. Ayres et al. – Tokyo; New York; Paris: United Nations University Press, 1994. – Pp. 167–179.
19. Federalnyi zakon ot 21.07.2014 № 219-FZ «O vnesenii izmenenii v Federalnyi zakon «Ob okhrane okruzhaiushchei sredy» i otdelnye zakonodatelnye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii» [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_165823/ (data obrashcheniia: 20.05.2020).
20.  Begak M.V., Guseva T.V.  Problemy provedeniia ekologicheskoi reformy v Rossii // Vodnoe khoziaistvo Rossii: problemy, tekhnologii, upravlenie. – 2015. – № 5. – S. 70–78.
21. Gerashchenko V.N. Pochemu zakryvaiutsia kirpichnye zavody? // Otraslevoi zhurnal «Stroitelstvo». – 2020. – № 1. – S. 58–61.
22. Almgren R., Skobelev D. Evolution of Technology and Technology Governance. In: Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. – 2020. – No. 6 (2), 22.23. Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on Industrial Emissions (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control.
24. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council of 4 November 2008 COM(2008) 699 «The raw materials initiative – meeting our critical needs for growth and jobs in Europe».
25. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 16 July 2008 COM(2008) 400 «Public procurement for a better environment».
26. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 11 March 2020 COM/2020/98 «A new Circular Economy Action Plan for a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe».
27. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 11 December 2009 COM/2019/640 «The European Green Deal».
28. Consolidated text: Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the Voluntary Participation by Organisations in a Community Eco-Management and Audit scheme (EMAS), repealing Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 and Commission Decisions 2001/681/EC and 2006/193/EC.
29. Skobelev D.O. Ekologicheskaia promyshlennaia politika: osnovnye napravleniia i printsipy stanovleniia v Rossii // Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 6: Ekonomika. – 2019. – № 4. – S. 78–94.
30. Nailuchshie dostupnye tekhnologii. Predotvrashchenie i kontrol promyshlennogo zagriazneniia. Etap 3: Otsenka deistvennosti politik v sfere NDT / Upravlenie po okruzhaiushchei srede, zdoroviu i bezopasnosti Direktsii po okruzhaiushchei srede OESR: per. s angl. – M.: FGAU «NII «TsEEP», 2019.
31. Federalnyi zakon ot 31.12.2014 № 488-FZ «O promyshlennoi politike v Rossiiskoi Federatsii» [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: rg.ru/2015/01/12/promyshlennost-dok.html (data obrashcheniia: 20.05.2020).
32. Tekhnicheskii reglament Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soiuza ot 03.03.2017 № TR EAES 041/2017 «O bezopasnosti khimicheskoi produktsii» [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: docs.cntd.ru/document/456065181 (data obrashcheniia: 20.05.2020).
33. Friege H. Waste – valuables – secondary resources – contaminants – waste again? In: Environmental Science Europe. – 2013. – Vol. 25. – Art. No. 9.
34. Skobelev D.O., Mikaelsson O. Nailuchshie dostupnye tekhnologii kak kriterii iskliucheniia rossiiskikh promyshlennykh predpriiatii iz spiska ekologicheskikh «goriachikh tochek» Barentseva Evro-Arkticheskogo regiona // Ekonomika ustoichivogo razvitiia. – 2020. – № 2. – S. 123–132.
35. Ofitsialnyi sait aktsionernogo obshchestva «Mondi Syktyvkarskii LPK» [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: mondigroup.com/en/about-mondi/where-we-operate/our-locations/europe/russia/mondi-syktyvkar/ (data obrashcheniia: 20.05.2020).
36. Ofitsialnyi sait OOO «Iuzhno-Uralskaia gorno-pererabatyvaiushchaia kompaniia» [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: yugpk.ru/production (data obrashcheniia: 20.05.2020).
37. Morozov K.M., Ilina I.S., Shilovskii V.A., Dergunov S.A. Novye gorizonty tsementnogo proizvodstva // Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitelstvo. – 2017. – № 11. – S. 77–80.
38. Nazarov V.P. Strategicheskoe planirovanie kak vazhneishii faktor povysheniia effektivnosti gosudarstvennogo upravleniia // Vlast. – 2015. – T. 21. – № 12. – S. 4–11.

Strategic bases of innovative development of territories (for example, the Kamsky agglomeration of the republic of Tatarstan)
Shinkevich A.I., Doctor of Economics, Professor, head of the Department of logistics and management, Kazan National Research Technological University
Pelevin O.V., assistant, Department of logistics and management, Kazan national research technological University

The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number 20-010-00655.

Annotation:
The article substantiates the need to develop a strategy for socio-economic development of the Kama cluster, its synchronization with the approved in 2016 strategies for socio-economic development of municipalities that are part of the Kama agglomeration, with the Strategy-2030 of the Republic of Tatarstan. Special attention is paid to the role of the Alabuga SEZ and the Kama innovation cluster as innovative tools for territorial development.
Keywords: competitive advantages, economic growth, SEZ «ALABUGA», Kama innovative cluster, territorial development, innovative economy, Republic of Tatarstan.

Referenses
1. Iusupova I.V. Strategii sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiia munitsipalnykh raionov do 2030 goda: opyt Respubliki Tatarstan // Regionalnaia ekonomika. Iug Rossii. – 2018. – № 1 (19). – S. 181–190.
2. Ministerstvo ekonomiki Respubliki Tatarstan [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: mert.tatarstan.ru (data obrashcheniia: 10.06.2020).
3. Iusupova I.V. Opredelenie strategicheskikh orientirov pri razrabotke strategii sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiia munitsipalnykh obrazovanii Respubliki Tatarstan // I.V. Iusupova, L.Kh. Kashapova // Kazanskii ekonomicheskii vestnik. – 2017. – № 5 (31). – S. 11–16.
4. OEZ «Alabuga» [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: alabuga.ru/ru/investors/brownfield/?utm_source=yandex&utm_medium=cpc_poisk&utm_campaign=50753248_ temat_dc&utm_content=8846688144&utm_term=oez&yclid=3071155803565883232#start (data obrashcheniia: 10.06.2020).
5. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po osushchestvleniiu strategicheskogo planirovaniia sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiia na urovne munitsipalnykh raionov (gorodskikh okrugov) Respubliki Tatarstan: utverzhdeny prikazom Ministerstva ekonomiki Respubliki Tatarstan ot 18.12.2015 № 534 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: mert.tatarstan.ru/rus/documents/ministry_documents.html/ (data obrashcheniia: 10.06.2020).
6. Ob utverzhdenii Strategii sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiia Respubliki Tatarstan do 2030 goda: prikaz Respubliki Tatarstan ot 17.06.2015 № 40-ZRT // Spravochno-pravovaia sistema «Garant-analitik» (data obrashcheniia: 10.06.2020).
7. Lubnina A.A. Innovative strategy for improving the efficiency of industrial enterprises management / Lubnina A.A. [et al.] // Espacios. – 2018. – Vol. 39. – No. 9. – P. 25.
8. Shinkevich A.I. Upravlenie otkrytymi natsionalnymi innovatsionnymi sistemami v ekonomike znanii: monografiia / A.I. Shinkevich, S.S. Kudriavtseva. – Kazan: Izd-vo Kazan. gos. nats. tekhnol. un-ta, 2014. – 204 s.
9. Krasnova O.M. Tendentsii razvitiia innovatsionnoi deiatelnosti v Respublike Tatarstan / O.M. Krasnova, S.S. Kudriavtseva // Ekonomicheskii vestnik Respubliki Tatarstan. – 2017. – № 2. – S. 50–59.

The role of national projects in the implementation of strategic priorities of sub-federal investment policy
Nevyantseva L.S., post-graduate student of the Department of regional, municipal Economics and management Ural state University of Economics

Annotation:
The article deals with the implementation of national investment projects in the Russian Federation. Theoretical and methodological aspects of national project management are considered. The main focus is on the analysis of trends and features of the implementation of national projects in the regions of the Federation. The level of implementation and first results of implementation of national projects for 2019 are presented. In conclusion, the key problems that make it difficult to achieve the maximum effect from the implementation of projects both in the country as a whole and in the regions are formulated. Some ways to eliminate complex issues in the practice of national project management are suggested.
Keywords: national projects, regional project regional development, Federal center, investment policy.

Referenses
1. Nevyantseva L.S., Dukhkhani A.B.D. Budget Financing of Infrastructure Projects as a Tool for Implementing the Investment Policy of the Regions of the Russian Federation // International Conference on Economics, Management and Technologies 2020 (ICEMT 2020). Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research. – Vol. 139. – Pp. 126–133.
2.  Kudelich M.I. Sistema normativnykh trebovanii k otsenke effektivnosti natsionalnykh proektov: aktualnye problemy // Finansovyi zhurnal. – 2019. – № 4. – S. 36–49.
3. Grodskaia G.N., Valiaeva E.S. Gosudarstvennye programmy v sisteme strategicheskogo planirovaniia: mekhanizm integratsii i realizatsiia printsipov proektnogo upravleniia // Vestnik Volzh. un-ta im. V.N. Tatishcheva. – 2019. – T. 2. – № 3. – S. 31–41.
4. Chekalin V.S., Karasev O.I., Rakov D.A. Natsionalnye tseli razvitiia i puti ikh dostizheniia // Izvestiia S.-Peterb. gos. ekon. un-ta. – 2019. – № 4 (118). – S. 14–19.
5.  Bondareva N.N., Komkov N.I. Organizatsionno-metodicheskie voprosy razrabotki i realizatsii natsionalnykh proektov // MIR (Modernizatsiia. Innovatsii. Razvitie). – 2019. – T. 10. – № 3. – S. 369–379.
6. Ivanov O.B., Bukhvald E.M. Investitsionnye prioritety v strategiiakh sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiia regionov Rossii // ETAP: Ekonomicheskaia teoriia, praktika, analiz. – 2018. – № 2. – S. 31–47.
7. Natsionalnye proekty: tselevye pokazateli i osnovnye rezultaty [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: comnews.ru/sites/default/files/de/docs/informacionnye_materialy-1.pdf (data obrashcheniia: 28.05.2020).
8. Ob osnovnykh podkhodakh k planirovaniiu biudzhetnykh assignovanii na realizatsiiu natsionalnykh proektov [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: minfin.ru/common/upload/library/2018/07/main/Ob_osnovnykh_podkhodakh_k_planirovaniu_BA_na_realizatsiu_nats_proektov.pdf (data obrashcheniia: 28.05.2020).
9. Putin nazval sistemnye problemy v realizatsii natsproektov [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: investfuture.ru/news/id/putin-nazval-sistemnye-problemy-v-realizacii-nacproektov (data obrashcheniia: 28.05.2020).
10. Biudzhetnyi kodeks RF. Statia 132. Subsidii biudzhetam subieektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii iz federalnogo biudzheta [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_19702/0859896f05c16d5719eafdf624507adf8887f0c7/ (data obrashcheniia: 28.05.2020).
11. Morozova L.S., Morozov V.Iu., Khavanova N.V., Litvinova E.V., Danilova V.A. Upravlenie regionalnymi i munitsipalnymi proektami // Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo. – 2018. – № 10 (99). – S. 1241–1244.
12. Ivanov O.B., Bukhvald E.M. Natsionalnye proekty Rossii: regionalnoe izmerenie // ETAP: Ekonomicheskaia teoriia, praktika, analiz. – 2019. – № 1. – S. 37–53.
13. Federalnaia adresnaia investitsionnaia programma [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: faip.economy.gov.ru/cgi/uis/faip.cgi/G1/region_list/2020 (data obrashcheniia: 28.05.2020).
14. Kak regiony raskhodovali gosudarstvennye dengi [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: rbc.ru/economics/29/11/2019/5ddfcfec9a7947d11e6cd375 (data obrashcheniia: 28.05.2020).
15. Osvoenie sredstv biudzheta na natsproekty za 2019 god sostavilo 91,45% [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: tass.ru/nacionalnye-proekty/7762311 (data obrashcheniia: 28.05.2020).
16. Monitoring dostizheniia natsionalnykh tselei [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: ng.ach.gov.ru/ (data obrashcheniia: 28.05.2020).
17. Nekotorye regiony Rossii zaiavili o nevozmozhnosti vypolneniia natsproektov [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: tsargrad-tv.turbopages.org/s/tsargrad.tv/articles/hjuston-u-nas-problemy-regiony-rossii-zajavili-o-nevozmozhnosti-vypolnenija-nacproektov_184343 (data obrashcheniia: 28.05.2020).
18. Regiony pozhalovalis na problemy s realizatsiei natsionalnykh proektov [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: riafan.ru/1196789-regiony-pozhalovalis-na-problemy-s-realizaciei-nacionalnykh-proektov (data obrashcheniia: 28.05.2020).
19. Natsionalnye proekty pravitelstva Rossii: u semi nianek ditia bez glaza [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: regnum.ru/news/polit/2799878.html (data obrashcheniia: 28.05.2020).
20. Funktsionirovanie proektnykh ofisov [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: ryazangov.ru/upload/iblock/34c/Funktsionirovanie-proektnykh-ofisov.-Metodicheskie-rekomendatsii.pdf (data obrashcheniia: 28.05.2020).
21. Zaporozhan A.Ia. K voprosu o realizatsii natsionalnykh proektov // Upravlencheskoe konsultirovanie. – 2019. – № 5. – S. 18–23.
22. Problemnye voprosy vypolneniia natsionalnykh proektov [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: bujet.ru/article/374787.php (data obrashcheniia: 28.05.2020).

 

ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT

Algorithm for evaluating the effectiveness of the organization's resource saving system
Kulikov Yu.A., PhD of economics, head of the pricing and project support Department of “Remvooruzhenie” JSC, the parent organization of the holding company of the state Corporation “Rostec”

Annotation:
The article offers an algorithm for evaluating the effectiveness of the organization’s resource-saving system by calculating scattering and dynamism indicators. The algorithm includes a sequence of actions for the evaluation and a recommended calculation method. The use of the algorithm allows us to characterize the resource-saving system as efficient or inefficient, static or dynamic. The evaluation results can serve as a basis for making system management decisions. The proposed method of evaluating the effectiveness of resource-saving systems is most applicable to industrial enterprises.
Keywords: efficiency, loss, system resource saving, the scattering index, a measure of dynamism, given the increased scattering.

Referenses
1. Ohno Taiichi. Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production, Productivity Press, 1988. – 208 p.
2. Sigeo Singo. Izuchenie proizvodstvennoi sistemy Toioty: per. s angl. – M.: Institut kompleksnykh strategicheskikh issledovanii, 2006. – 312 s.
3. Zakharov A.N. Razrabotka modelei upravleniia resursosberezheniem // Voprosy ekonomiki perekhodnogo perioda. – M.: Ros. ekon. akad., 1996.

Russian industrial enterprises required new digital control model
Konovalova G.I., Doctor of Economics, Professor, Department of Economics, Organization of Production, Management of Bryansk State Technical University

Annotation:
The concept of a digital economy requires the development of a new digital model for managing Russian industrial enterprises. This model of production management should work with all elements of the value chain, take into account all the factors that determine the dynamic heterogeneous production, and also have a permanent change management mechanism. To create a new model, the changes that have occurred so far in industrial production, and the factors determining the need for a universal system for the operational management of dynamic heterogeneous production are investigated. The developed digital management model radically changes the system of planned calculations, operational production accounting, control, analysis and regulation of production at the enterprise and ensures their accuracy and transparency. The study develops the theory and methodology of production management in a digital economy.
Keywords: industrial enterprise, control system, digital model, planning module, factors of production dynamics, resources, costs, stocks.

Referenses
1. Programma «Tsifrovaia ekonomika Rossiiskoi Federatsii», utverzhdennaia Pravitelstvom RF ot 28 iiulia 2017 g. № 1632-r [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: government.ru/docs/28653/ (data obrashcheniia: 23.10.2019).
2. Tsifrovaia ekonomika i Industriia 4.0: novye vyzovy: tr. nauch.-prakt. konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem / pod red. A.V. Babkina. – SPb.: Izd-vo Politekhn. un-ta, 2018. – 573 s.
3. Vertakova Iu.V. Transformatsiia upravlencheskikh sistem pod vozdeistviem tsifrovizatsii ekonomiki: monografiia / Iu.V. Vertakova, T.O. Tolstykh, E.V. Shkarupeta, V.V. Dmitrieva. – Kursk: IuZGU, 2017. – 156 s.
4. Plotnikov V.A. Tsifrovizatsiia proizvodstva: teoreticheskaia sushchnost i perspektivy razvitiia / V.A. Plotnikov // Izvestiia S.-Peterb. gos. ekon. un-ta. – 2018. – № 4.
5. Konovalova G.I. Teoriia, metodologiia, praktika operativnogo upravleniia dinamichnym raznotipnym mashinostroitelnym proizvodstvom: monografiia / G.I. Konovalova. – Briansk: BGTU, 2018. – 187 s.
6. Titov V.V. Integratsiia strategicheskogo planirovaniia i operatsionnoi deiatelnosti na predpriiatii na osnove optimizatsionnogo modelirovaniia / V.V. Titov, D.A. Bezmelnitsyn // Vestnik NGU. – 2015. – T. 15. – S. 123–130.
7. Kablashova I.V. Innovatsionnoe razvitie sistemy upravleniia predpriiatiem v usloviiakh tsifrovoi transformatsii / I.V. Kablashova, Iu.A. Salikov, I.V. Logunova // Organizator proizvodstva. – 2019. – № 3. – S. 46–58.
8. Konovalova G.I. Razvitie metodologii operativnogo upravleniia proizvodstvom na promyshlennom predpriiatii v kontseptsii «industriia 4.0» // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom. – 2019. – № 2. – S. 79–85.

Collaborative approach to working capital management in supply chains
Ivakina A.A., Doctoral student, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg University

Annotation:
The article is devoted to working capital management and optimization issues on inter-organizational level. We aim to develop and validate a model of collaborative approach to working capital management in supply chains for the case of constrained liquidity using supply chain finance instruments.
Keywords: working capital, cash conversion cycle, collaborative cash conversion cycle.

Referenses
1. Gupta S., Dutta K. (2011). Modeling of financial supply chain // European Journal of Operational Research, 211 (1), 47–56.
2. Viskari S., & Kärri T. (2013). A cycle time model for analysing the efficiency of working capital management in a value chain // International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 5 (3), 221–238.
3. Talonpoika A.M., Kärri T., Pirttilä M.,  & Monto S. (2016). Defined strategies for financial working capital management // International Journal of Managerial Finance, 12 (3).
4. Akkermans H.A., Bogerd P., Yücesan E., & Van Wassenhove L.N. (2003). The impact of ERP on supply chain management: Exploratory findings from a European Delphi study // European Journal of Operational Research, 146 (2), 284–301.
5. Flynn B.B., Huo B., and Zhao X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach // Journal of Operations Management, 28 (1), 58–71.
6.  Shi M., and  Yu W.  (2013). Supply chain management and financial performance: literature review and future directions // International Journal of Operations and Production Management (Vol. 33).
7. Wuttke D.A., Blome C., Henke M. (2013). Focusing the financial flow of supply chains: An empirical investigation of financial supply chain management // International Journal of Production Economics, 145 (2), 773–789.
8. Richards V.D.,  and  Laughlin E.J. (1980). A Cash Conversion Cycle Approach to Liquidity Analysis // Financial Management, 9 (1), 32–38.
9. Hofmann E., & Kotzab H.  (2010). A Supply Chain-Oriented Approach of Working Capital Management // Journal of Business Logistics, 31 (2), 305–330.
10.  Garanina T.A., Belova O.A. (2015). Liquidity, cash conversion cycle and financial performance: case of Russian companies // Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 12 (1), 90–100.

Business reputation of a corporation. Finding a method of assessment
Krioni А.Е., Individual entrepreneur «А.Е. Krioni», Moscow, Russia

Annotation:
The article presents the author’s vision of the business reputation of the company as a reputation capital formed by positive and negative assessments of business in the business environment. Focuses on the problems of their application in unpredictable business practices due to lack of transparency. The reputation in business activities is linked to the specifics of business relations in the Russian Federation. Directions of improving methodological support for assessing the business reputation of counterparty organizations are proposed.
Keywords:  intangible assets, goodwill, IFRS, criteria for assessing goodwill.

Referenses
1. Fasmer M. Etimologicheskii slovar russkogo iazyka: v 4-kh t. / per. s nem. i dop. O.N. Trubacheva. – M.: Progress, 1987. – T. 3.
2. Chernykh P.Ia. Istoriko-etimologicheskii slovar sovremennogo russkogo iazyka: v 2-kh t. – M.: Russkii iazyk, 1999. – T. 2.
3. Kriukova Iu.E. Reputatsiia: etimologiia poniatiia i poisk sotsialno-filosofskikh osnovanii analiza. K postanovke problemy // Prostranstvo i vremia. – 2015. – № 3 (21).
4. Mikhelson A.D. Obieiasnenie 25 000 inostrannykh slov, voshedshikh v upotreblenie v russkii iazyk, s oznacheniem ikh kornei. – M.: Izd-vo A.I. Manukhina, 1865. – S. 2718.
5. Chudinov A.N. Slovar inostrannykh slov, voshedshikh v sostav russkogo iazyka. – M.: Izdanie V.I. Gubinskogo, 1894. – S. 654.
6.  Popov M. Slovar inostrannykh slov, voshedshikh v upotreblenie v russkom iazyke. – M.: Izd-vo tip. t-va I.D. Sytina, 1911. – S. 458.
7. Pavlenkov F.F. Slovar inostrannykh slov, voshedshikh v sostav russkogo iazyka. – M.: Kniga po trebovaniiu, 2016. – S. 360.
8. Tolkovyi slovar russkogo iazyka: 72 500 slov i 7500 frazeologicheskikh vyrazhenii / S.I. Ozhegov, N.Iu. Shvedova; Rossiiskaia AN, In-t rus. iaz., Rossiiskii fond kultury. – 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. – M.: Azie, 1994. – S. 907.
9. Bolshoi tolkovyi slovar russkogo iazyka / pod red. D.N. Ushakova. – M.: OOO «Izdatelstvo AST»: OOO «Izdatelstvo Astrel», 2004. – S. 196.
10. Trubnikov P.Ia. Zashchita grazhdanskikh prav v sude. – M.: Iuridicheskaia literatura, 1990. – S. 224.
11. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda ot 25.04.1995 № 6 «O vnesenii izmenenii i dopolnenii v nekotorye postanovleniia Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii». Biulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. – 1995. – № 7. – S. 3–6.
12. Grazhdanskii kodeks RF (chast chetvertaia) ot 18.12.2006 № 230-FZ // Rossiiskaia gazeta. – 2006. – № 289 (22 dek.).
13. Polozhenie po bukhgalterskomu uchetu «Uchet nematerialnykh aktivov» (PBU 14/07): prikaz Minfina Rossii ot 27.12.2007 № 153n [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_63465/ (data obrashcheniia: 01.05.2020).
14. Mezhdunarodnye standarty finansovoi otchetnosti. – M.: Askeri – ASSA, 2008.
15. Kazakova N.A., Romanova N.V. Uchet, analiz i otsenka nematerialnykh aktivov kompanii v usloviiakh innovatsionnoi ekonomiki. // Imushchestvennye otnosheniia v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. – 2014. – № 8. – S. 53–64.
16. Kazakova N.A. O problemakh otsenki, ucheta i kommertsializatsii rezultatov intellektualnoi deiatelnosti v Rossii / N.A. Kazakova, N.V. Romanova, O.L. Shemetkova // Imushchestvennye otnosheniia v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. – 2018. – № 8 (202). – S. 30–40.
17. Kazakova N.A. Analiz kommercheskoi znachimosti sobstvennykh nauchnykh razrabotok lizingovykh kompanii // Lizing. – 2014. – № 6. – S. 42–46.
18. Kazakova N.A. Otsenka kommercheskoi znachimosti rezultatov intellektualnoi deiatelnosti // Pravo. – 2015. – № 1. – S. 17–20.
19. Kazakova N.A. Vnutrifirmennyi kontrol operatsii s intellektualnoi sobstvennostiu na osnove metodologii COSO. – M.: Fundamentalnye issledovaniia. – 2016. – № 11 (ch. 1). – S. 177–182.
20.  Kazakova N.A., Fedchenko E.A. Institutsionalnye analiticheskie aspekty i problemy dostovernosti uchetnoi informatsii o razvitii biznesa // Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet. – 2012. – № 35 (233). – S. 2–12.
21. Zaman Arif. Reputatsionnyi risk: upravlenie v tseliakh sozdaniia stoimosti. – M.: Olimp-Biznes, 2008. – 416 s.
22. Baiburina E.R., Grebtsova E.G.  Raskrytie informatsii ob intellektualnom kapitale i ego vliianie na stoimost kompanii na razvivaiushchikhsia rynkakh kapitala // Korporativnye finansy. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 112–139 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: cyberleninka.ru/article/n/raskrytie-informatsii-ob-intellektualnom-kapitale-i-ego-vliyanie-na-stoimost-kompaniy-na-razvivayuschihsya-rynkah-kapitala
23. Bogoiavlenskii A.E. Poniatiia «imidzh», «reputatsiia», «obraz» v kontekste «Kritiki chistogo razuma» I. Kanta // Aktsenty. – 2004. – № 5–6 (48–49). – S. 57–63.
24. Andrianova E.P. Osobennosti upravleniia delovoi reputatsiei kommercheskogo banka // E.P. Andrianova, A.A. Barannikov // Nauchnyi zhurnal KubGAU. – 2013. – № 87 (03). – S. 2–19.
25. Purmel M.I. Reputatsiia korporatsii: formirovanie i upravlenie // Reputatsiologiia. – 2009. – № 1. – S. 26–42.
26.  Korotkov E.M.  Delovaia reputatsiia promyshlennogo predpriiatiia v sisteme rynochnoi ekonomiki // Vestnik IuRGTU (NPI). – 2012. – № 2. – C. 31–37.
27. Iachmeneva V.M. Obosnovanie sistemy pokazatelei otsenki urovnia delovoi reputatsii predpriiatiia / V.M. Iachmeneva, A.O. Lazukina // Ustoichivoe razvitie sotsialno-ekonomicheskoi sistemy Rossiiskoi Federatsii: materialy XVII nauch.-prakt. konf., pgt. Gurzuf, 4 dekabria 2015 g. – Simferopol: IT «ARIAL», 2016. – S. 289–295.

 

STUFF MANAGEMENT

Formation of diagnostic and evaluation tools for the analysis of intellectual activity of personnel in the global digitalization of the scientific space
Petruk G.V., Candidate of pedagogic science, associate professor of the chair of Economy and Management, director of research activity Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service, 41 Gogolya str., Vladivostok, 690014, Russian Federation
Shashlo N.V., Candidate of economic science, associate professor of the chair of Economy and Management Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service, 41 Gogolya str., Vladivostok, 690014, Russian Federation

This work was financially supported by the Grant of the President of the Russian Federation, No. NSh-2668-2020.6 «National-Cultural and Digital Trends in the Socio-Economic, Political and Legal Development of the Russian Federation in the 21st Century».

Annotation:
The conceptual-categorical apparatus of the process of intellectualization was further developed in the article. The essential characteristic of the concept of «intellectual activity of the staff». Diagnostic and evaluation tools for analyzing the intellectual activity of personnel in the global digitalization of the scientific space have been developed. It is recommended that the proposed integrated level of intellectual activity be assessed by key criteria: the level of intellectual cooperation with the external environment, the level of fulfillment of the intellectual load, the level of use of new professional knowledge, the level of publication effectiveness, the level of innovation of the intellectual knowledge product. The article is of interest to top management organizations managers of intellectual activity of personnel.
Keywords: intellectual activity, intellectualization, digital economy, digitalization, intellectual and knowledge asset.

Referenses
1. Rubvalter D.A., Rudenskii O.V. Kontseptualnyi instrumentarii tsifrovizatsii, izmereniia i otsenki ispolzovaniia rezultatov nauchnykh issledovanii i publikatsii v politike Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Vlast. – 2019. – T. 27. – № 3. – S. 265–275.
2. Filinov V.A., Vasileva E.V. Informatsionnye resursy i intellektualnyi trud v sovremennoi sisteme ekonomicheskikh otnoshenii // Nauka Krasnoiaria. – 2019. – T. 8. – № 5–3. – S. 150–154.
3. Vorobev A.D. Tsifrovaia ekonomika i ekonomika znanii // Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki. – 2019. – № 1 (69). – S. 16–22.
4. Iakovleva A.V. Tsifrovaia ekonomika i formirovanie natsionalnoi sistemy informatsionnoi bezopasnosti v Rossii // Finansovaia ekonomika. – 2019. – № 3. – S. 551–560.
5. Buriak V.V. Tsifrovaia ekonomika, khaktivizm i kiberbezopasnost: monografiia. – Simferopol: IP Zueva T.V., 2019. – 140 s.
6. Roboty zaiavliaiut o svoikh pravakh. Doktrinalno-pravovye osnovy i nravstvenno-eticheskie standarty primeneniia avtonomnykh robotizirovannykh tekhnologii i apparatov / A.Iu. Mamychev, A.Iu. Mordovtsev, G.V. Petruk, N.V. Shashlo i dr. – M.: Izd. tsentr RIOR, 2020. – 349 s.
7. Petruk G.V., Shashlo N.V. Instrumenty resheniia prioritetnykh zadach natsionalnogo proekta «Nauka»: praktika universitetov // Territoriia novykh vozmozhnostei. Vestnik Vladivostok. gos. un-ta ekonomiki i servisa. – 2019. – T. 11. – № 3. – S. 177–189.
8.  Osipov V.A., Kuzubov A.A. Otsenka innovatsionnogo razvitiia promyshlennykh predpriiatii i puti ego // Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniia. – 2018. – № 1. – S. 89–97.
9. Rodionov A.V., Kozin M.N., Pripoten V.Y. Innovative development of grain products subcomplex as the driver of national food security provision, Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development. – 2019. – Vol. 19. – Iss. 3. – Pp. 493–498.
10.  Volodarskaia E.A. Dinamika kriteriev otsenki rezultativnosti nauchnykh issledovanii // Sotsiologiia nauki i tekhnologii. – 2019. – T. 10. – № 2. – S. 120–128.
11.  Strizhakova E.N., Strizhakov D.V. Tsifrovaia ekonomika: problemy i perspektivy razvitiia // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom. – 2019. – № 2. – S. 27–33.
12. Gogiia S.T., Shulumba V.M. Osobennosti partnerstva vlasti i biznesa v realizatsii tselei natsionalnogo proekta «Tsifrovaia ekonomika» // Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniia. – 2019. – T. 5. – № 1. – S. 32–40.
13. Rodionov O.V., Cherkasov A.V. Formation of innovative-integrated quality control system of agrarian higher education // Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. – 2013. – No. 1. – Pp. 141–148.
14. Lukicheva L.I. Intellektualnaia aktivnost – kliuchevoi faktor innovatsionnogo razvitiia // Ekonomicheskie i sotsialno-gumanitarnye issledovaniia. – 2016. – № 2 (10). – S. 32–33.
15. Kuzubov A.A., Shashlo N.V. Teoreticheskie aspekty formirovaniia rynka vysokotekhnologicheskikh uslug kak kliuchevogo faktora innovatsionnogo razvitiia mirovogo khoziaistva // Ekonomika: teoriia i praktika. – 2017. – № 1 (45). – S. 26–30.
16.  Novozhilova N.V. Intellektualizatsiia truda v informatsionnom obshchestve: monografiia. – Cheboksary: Izd-vo Chuvash. gos. un-ta im. I.N. Ulianova, 2019. – 188 s.
17.  PetrukG.V., ShashloN.V.  Implementation of the Science Development Strategy: New and Non-Standard Solutions // Dilemas contemporaneos-educacion politica y valores. – 2019. – Vol. 7 (1).
18.  Vorozhbit O.Y., Shashlo N.V., Rodionov A.V. Mechanism of strategic, politic and process management of universities educational services quality // Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. – 2016. – Vol. 11 (14). – Pp. 3058–3066.
19. Metodika rascheta kachestvennogo pokazatelia gosudarstvennogo zadaniia «Kompleksnyi ball publikatsionnoi rezultativnosti», utverzhdennaia Minobrnauki Rossii 30.12.2019 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: minobrnauki.gov.ru/ru/documents/NPA_prikazy/ (data obrashcheniia: 30.03.2020).

Relationship between gender diversification of corporate governance and financial performance of companies
Voyko D.V., Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor of «Finance and Credit» FSBEI HE «State University of Management»
Voyko A.V., Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor of «Finance and Credit» FSBEI HE «State University of Management»

Annotation:
In the modern world equipment, real estate, and money savings themselves have ceased to play the role of sufficient factors for the development and growth of companies. Human capital is becoming more and more a determining criterion for evaluating the prospects of companies in the competitive struggle. At the same time, the structure of human capital of companies looks quite similar today, where the main managerial positions are occupied and, consequently, the main managerial decisions are made by representatives of one gender. Just as any developed society cannot be made up entirely of representatives of the same gender, race or ethnicity, so a company should not be limited to inviting people to leadership and key positions selected according to one objective criterion.
The article reveals the issues of relevance of gender diversification both at the state level and at the level of individual companies. The problem of women’s participation in the management of modern companies and the interest of modern business in increasing the number of women among the Board members of companies are discussed. The article also presents the results of research to assess the impact of gender diversification on the financial performance of companies with real examples of companies’ experience in solving the problem of gender diversity in corporate governance bodies of companies.
Keywords: gender diversity, the Board of Directors, economic profit, gender gap.

Referenses
1. Gendernoe neravenstvo v mire [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: ilpost.it/2014/10/28/gender-gap-2014 (data obrashcheniia: 03.04.2020).
2. Vsemirnyi ekonomicheskii forum. Doklad o globalnom gendernom neravenstve 2020 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: weforum.org/reports/gender-gap-2020-report-100-years-pay-equality (data obrashcheniia: 03.04.2020).
3. Gendernaia statistika Evropeiskogo instituta po gendernomu ravenstvu (EIGE): instrument v podderzhku razrabotki politiki [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/ece/ces/ge.30/2016/WS/WP23_EIGE_RUS.pdf
(data obrashcheniia: 31.03.2020).
4. Nomination process and gender equality in corporate governance bodies (Gennari F., The 3rd Virtual Multidisciplinary Conference, 2015).
5. The gender employment gap: Challenges and solutions [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef1638en_1.pdf (data obrashcheniia: 03.04.2020).
6. PwC’s 2019 Annual Corporate Directors Survey [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: pwc.com/us/en/services/governance-insights-center/assets/pwc-2019-annual-corporate-directors-survey-full-report-v2.pdf.pdf (data obrashcheniia: 02.04.2020).
7. Ravenstvo i usilenie gendernykh razlichii. Ebc Сonsulting [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: ebcconsulting.com/uguaglianza-e-valorizzazione-delle-differenze-di-genere-nelle-risorse-umane-in-azienda.html (data obrashcheniia: 04.04.2020).
8. Gendernyi balans: Sodexo zadaetsia voprosom o vliianii na biznes [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: techfromthenet.it/201905218643/News-attualita/sodexo-si-interroga-sull-impatto-in-azienda-del-gender-balance.html (data obrashcheniia: 30.03.2020).
9. Hunt Vivian, Yee Lareina, Prince Sara, Dixon-Fyle Sundiatu. Delivering through diversity. Report 2018 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/delivering-through-diversity (data obrashcheniia: 05.04.2020).

 

ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT

Oecd countries experience in developing green economy business segments
Kozhevina O.V., Dr. econ. Sci, Professor, Bauman Moscow State Technical University (National Research University)

This article was prepared with the financial support of the RFBR Grant 20-010-00182.

Annotation:
One of the most serious problems of our time, the global threat is climate change and the negative consequences of this. The international community, large international organizations are joining forces to mitigate anthropogenic consequences, focusing on innovative forms of entrepreneurship. Green entrepreneurship is actively supported in OECD countries. The object of the study in the article is «green» entrepreneurship and «green» growth strategies in OECD countries, and the best business practices in accordance with the goals of sustainable development in different segments are investigated. The analysis and generalization of documents and recommendations of the OECD in the field of sustainable development, «green» business. The factors of SDG integration into entrepreneurial activity and the advantages of business models of companies focused on «green» entrepreneurship are identified. The directions of implementing an effective strategy of companies in «green» entrepreneurship are proposed.
Keywords: OECD, best practices, green economy, entrepreneurship, economic security of entrepreneurship.

Referenses
1. Kurs na zelenyi rost. Reziume dlia lits, prinimaiushchikh resheniia. Broshiura. Organizatsiia ekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva i razvitiia (OESR), mai 2011 g. [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: oecd.org/greengrowth/48634082.pdf (data obrashcheniia: 26.04.2020).
2. Nicolaisen J., Dean A., Hoeller P. Economics and the environment: a survey of issues and policy option // OECD Economic Studies. – Spring 1991. – No 16.
3. Towards Green Growth: Monitoring Progress. OECD Indicators. Published OECD. 2011.
4. The OECD Green Growth Strategy and its measurement framework. Published OECD, 2016.
5. Green Economy Transition Approach. Public Document European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 2015.
6. Environmental Policy Toolkit for Greening SMEs in the EU Eastern Partnership countries. First edition. Published OECD, 2015.
7. Unsere Strategie für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: bfn.de/fileadmin/MDB/documents/BRD_2002_NH-Strat.pdf (data obrashcheniia: 25.04.2020).
8. Green growth in action: Germany [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: oecd.org/germany/green growthin actiongermany.htm (data obrashcheniia: 25.04.2020).
9. Green Entrepreneurship in London-Barriers and Opportunities [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/lsdc_-_green_entrepreneurship_in_london_-_scoping_report_2013.pdf (data obrashcheniia: 25.04.2020).
10. Gutterish A. Nam nuzhen vsplesk diplomatii mira // Impact Style. – 2018. – № 2. – S. 11–19.
11. Enhancing the Contributions of SMEs in a Global and Digitalised Economy. OECD. 2017 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: oecd.org/mcm/documents/C-MIN-2017-8-EN.pdf (data obrashcheniia: 22.04.2020).
12. SMEs: Key drivers of green and inclusive growth. OECD Green Growth Papers, 2019. – 56 p.

 

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT

Analysis and valuation of intellectual property in an unstable economy
Kokurin D.I., Professor, Doctor of Economics, Professor of the Department of Economics and Management, ANO VO «Moscow International University»
Kumelashvili M.Z., Senior Lecturer, Department of Economics and Management, ANO VO «Moscow International University»

Annotation:
Innovative activity and scientific progress affect the vast majority of spheres of human activity and the relevance of intellectual property, and the assessment of its value is currently increasing every day. Any country has its own peculiarities to approaches for assessing intangible assets and the results of intellectual activity.
The article discusses such concepts as «intellectual property», «intellectual capital», «innovative projects». Classical and modern interpretations of intellectual property are considered. Issues related to the valuation of intellectual property are raised. An analysis was also made of the data provided by Rospatent and plans for optimization in working with intellectual property were highlighted.
Keywords: intellectual property, innovative projects, intellectual capital, unstable economy, cost estimation methods, Rospatent, trademarks, utility models, inventions, industrial designs.

Referenses
1. Gribov P.G. Otsenka effektivnosti organizatsii cherez izmerenie velichiny intellektualnogo kapitala // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom. – 2014. – № 2. – S. 119–124.
2.  Christensen C.M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma. Harvard Bisiness School Press, Boston. – 238 p. – P. 54.
3. Gribov P.G., Lozik N.F. Upravlenie konkurentosposobnostiu organizatsii // Internet-zhurnal «Naukovedenie». – 2016. – T. 8. – № 3 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: naukovedenie.ru/PDF/101EVN316.pdf (dostup svobodnyi).
4. Zharova A.K. Zashchita intellektualnoi sobstvennosti: uchebnik dlia bakalavriata i magistratury / pod obshch. red. A.A. Streltsova. – 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M.: Izd-vo «Iurait», 2019. – 341 s.
5. ROSPATENT: tsifry, fakty i proekty 2019 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: rupto.ru/content/uploadfiles/annual-report-2019-short-version.pdf
6. ROSPATENT [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: rupto.ru/ru
7. VOIS. Rukovodiashchie printsipy ispolzovaniia fakticheskikh dannykh, poluchennykh v khode provedeniia issledovanii, v interesakh razrabotki politiki [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: wipo.int/econ_stat/ru/economics/news/2019/news_0004.html
8. VOIS [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: wipo.int/econ_stat/ru/economics/news/2019/news_0004.html

Indicators of the degree of social responsibility of business
Bikeeva M.V., Ph.D. in Economics (Candidate of economic sciences), assistant professor of the Department of Statistics, Econometrics and IT in management,   Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University»

The article is prepared with financial support from Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) and the Republic of Mordovia Government, project № 18-410-130005.

Annotation:
The stakeholder approach is considered as a basis for coordinating the interests of government and business in the processes of regional development. Among the priorities of the stakeholder approach is to strengthen long-term relationships with interested groups, focus on social responsibility and society’s problems. The purpose of the study is to determine the indicators of the degree of social responsibility of business. The article proposes twenty-six local criteria combined in blocks. Among the principles for selecting criteria: relevance and usefulness for use, analytical nature and measurability.
Keywords: social responsibility of business, stakeholder approach, social investment, indicators, local assessment criteria.

Referenses
1. Clarkson M.A. Stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance // Academy of Management Review. – 1995. – Vol. 20 (1). – Pp. 92–117.
2. Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.J. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts// Academy of Management Review. – 1997. – Vol. 22 (4). – Pp. 853–886.
3.  Phillips R.A.  Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness // Business Ethics Quarterly. – 1997. – Vol. 7 (1). – Pp. 51–66.
4.  Fassin Y.  The stakeholder model refined // Journal of Business Ethics. – 2009. – Vol. 84 (1). – Pp. 113–135.
5. Blagov Iu.E. Korporativnaia sotsialnaia otvetstvennost: evoliutsiia kontseptsii / Iu.E. Blagov; Vysshaia shkola menedzhmenta SPbGU. – SPb.: Izd-vo «Vysshaia shkola menedzhmenta», 2010. – 272 s.
6. Iliuk V.V. Metodologicheskii podkhod k upravleniiu steikkholderami innovatsionnykh proektov // Organizator proizvodstva. – 2016. – № 4. – S. 38–55.
7.  Tazhitdinov I.A. Primenenie steikkholderskogo podkhoda v strategicheskom upravlenii razvitiem territorii // Ekonomika regiona. – 2013. – № 2 (34). – S. 17–27.
8.  Finogeeva A.I. Sovershenstvovanie mekhanizma vzaimodeistviia kompanii s zainteresovannymi storonami // Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal. – 2017. – № 3 (97). – S. 8.
9. Tsipes G.L., Shadaeva N.M. Upravlenie vzaimootnosheniiami s zainteresovannymi storonami proekta: ot prostogo k slozhnomu (Ch. 1) // Upravlenie proektami i programmami. – 2015. – № 02 (42). – S. 138–156.
10. Tsipes G.L., Shadaeva N.M. Upravlenie vzaimootnosheniiami s zainteresovannymi storonami proekta: ot prostogo k slozhnomu (Ch. 2) // Upravlenie proektami i programmami. – 2015. – № 03 (43). – S. 218–228.
11. Bikeeva M.V. Rol zainteresovannykh grupp v deiatelnosti sovremennogo predpriiatiia // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom. – 2017. – № 2. – S. 97–104.
12. Bikeeva M.V. Vliianie khoziaistvennoi deiatelnosti na sostoianie okruzhaiushchei sredy v Respublike Mordoviia // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 62–68.
13. Doklad o sotsialnykh investitsiiakh v Rossii – 2014: k sozdaniiu tsennosti dlia biznesa i obshchestva / Iu.E. Blagov [(i dr.)]; pod obshch. red. Iu.E. Blagova, I.S. Soboleva. – SPb.: Avtorskaia tvorcheskaia masterskaia (ATM «Kniga»), 2014. – 144 s.
14. Kostina S.A. Sravnitelnyi analiz modelei upravleniia zainteresovannymi storonami proekta // Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniia i razrabotki. – 2018. – № 5 (22). – S. 363–368.
15. Sazhin Y.V., Bikeeva M.V., Bakanach O.V., Kornev V.M., Sozonova E.E. Modern Business Restructuring in the Context of the Stakeholder Theory // International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research. – 2017. – Т. 15. – Vol. 17. – Pp. 183–190.

Management mechanism of industrial enterprise innovative activity efficiency
Vasyaycheva V.A., PhD, Associate Professor of Human Resource Management at Samara National Research University

Annotation:
Innovation is one of the key factors in increasing the industrial enterprises competitiveness. Due to the digital transformation of the domestic economy there is a need to rethink approaches to innovative management. In this regard, special attention is required to the structure and content of its components, their relationship and architecture. The article presents the author’s management mechanism of innovative activity efficiency. It based on the process-functional approach and the principles of a comprehensive analysis of the enterprise as a whole and innovation, in particular. The proposed methodological tools are relevant both for employees of the research sphere and for the industrial enterprises leaders.
Keywords: management mechanism, innovative activity, efficiency, competitiveness, industrial enterprise, functional process approach.

Referenses
1. Vasiaicheva V.A. Prakticheskaia realizatsiia tekhnologii otsenki effektivnosti innovatsionnoi deiatelnosti promyshlennykh predpriiatii // Vestnik Samar. munitsip. in-ta upravleniia. – 2019. – № 4. – S. 7–15.
2. Kiseleva O.N. Metodologiia formirovaniia sbalansirovannoi strategii innovatsionnogo razvitiia promyshlennykh predpriiatii: dis. ... d-ra ekon. nauk. – 2018. – 382 s.
3. Mishchenko L.Ia., Arutiunov E.Iu. Formirovanie mekhanizma upravleniia razvitiem promyshlennoi korporatsii: monografiia. – Krasnodar, 2002. – 128 s.
4. Novikov D.A., Ivashchenko A.A. Modeli i metody organizatsionnogo upravleniia innovatsionnym razvitiem firmy. – M.: Kom Kniga, 2006. – 336 s.
5. Iureva L.V., Dolzhenkova E.V. Innovatsionnaia privlekatelnost promyshlennykh predpriiatii v usloviiakh novoi ekonomiki: monografiia. – Nizhnii Tagil: NTI (filial) UrFU, 2017. – 102 s.
6. Vasiaicheva V.A., Gerasimov B.N. Razvitie protsessa innovatsionnoi deiatelnosti predpriiatiia // Vestnik Samar. gos. ekon. un-ta. – 2018. – № 10 (168). – S. 69–76.

Requirements to Manuscripts



Все права принадлежат Издательству «Финпресс» Полное или частичное воспроизведение или размножение каким-либо способом материалов допускается только с письменного разрешения Издательства «Финпресс».